🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Fixed payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, typical households spends $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning because partisan disputes over subsidies which analysts predict could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider National Health Insurance?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – simply expand to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income must contribute about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to supporting medical services. When including those costs versus what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses like mine. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Due to simplification, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system where they have to decipher the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that public institutions has a significant role in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Of course there are. Given all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a better and less expensive approach both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes are necessary.